Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Theology/3

Whenever I read Cynthia Rylant’s God poems, I am reminded of this poetic vignette from Eduardo Galeano’s Book of Embraces, which I’m just quoting here and not rereading right now.

"Errata: where the Old Testament says what it says, perhaps it should say what its main protagonist has confessed to me:

A pity that Adam was so stupid. A pity that Eve was so deaf. A pity that I didn’t know how to make myself understood.

Adam and Eve were the first human beings made by my hand and I realize that they had certain defects in structure, assembly, and finish. They were not ready to listen, or to think. And I. . .well, maybe I was not ready to speak. Before Adam and Eve, I had never talked to anybody. I had pronounced grand phrases, like “Let there be light,” but always alone. So the day I met Adam and Eve in the cool of the evening, I wasn’t very eloquent. I lacked practice.

My first feeling was that of astonishment. They had just stolen the fruit from the forbidden tree in the center of Paradise. Adam had assumed the expression of a general about to surrender his sword, and Eve was staring at the ground as if counting ants. But they were both incredibly young and beautiful and radiant. They surprised me. I had made them, but I didn’t know that mud could look so luminous.

Later, I admit, I felt envy. Just as no one can give me orders, I know nothing of the dignity of disobedience. Nor can I know the boldness of love, which requires two. In keeping with the principle of authority, I resisted the desire to congratulate them for having suddenly grown wise in human passion.

Then came the misunderstandings. They understood “fall” where I spoke of “flight.” They thought that a sin deserved punishment if it was original. I said that those who fail to love are sinners; they understood that those who love are sinners. Where I spoke of a meadow of joy they understood a vale of tears. I said that pain was the salt that gave flavor to the human adventure; they understood that I was condemning them by granting them the glory of being mortal and a little nuts. They got everything backwards. And they believed it.

Lately, I’ve been suffering from insomnia. For several millennia now, I’ve been having trouble falling asleep. And I like sleeping, I really do, because when I sleep, I dream. Then I become a lover, I burn myself in the brief flame of fleeting love, I am a strolling player, a deep-sea fisherman, or a Gypsy fortune teller; I devour even the leaves of the forbidden tree and drink and dance until I’m rolling on the ground.

When I wake up, I’m alone. I have no one to play with because the angels take me so seriously, nor have I anyone to desire. I am condemned to desire myself. I wander from star to star, growing bored in the empty universe. I feel very tired, I feel very alone. I am alone—alone for all eternity."

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

God is fallible? Hmmm...
God exists? Hmmm...
Creation was full of mistakes? Hmmm..
God admits he goofed? Hmmm....
God has human emotions? Hmmm....

Oh, the directions you could go, discussing this piece of prose. But I won't!

Christine said...

I think it is absolute poetry, full of beauty and longing.

Sophia Varcados said...

I hope that enlightenment is a not the realization of eternal lonliness. Perhaps Buddhism is less desolate...

Anonymous said...

Sure, but thought-provoking none-the-less.
I know nothing about Galeano and have no idea from where he writes. Do you think he wrote it to be enjoyed for its poetic merit or is he sending another message - religious or otherwise? One could draw analogies with many great leaders and the loneliness and self-doubt they endure due to their position. Or it could be the emptiness anyone feels in a failed or flawed endeavor?
Gotta sympathize with the sleep disorder though!

Christine said...

I think the god in the poem needs enlightenment. Or at least a companion.

I can't say that I know Galeano's thoughts or reasons behind writing it, but as an artist, he might say: If the metaphor works, then go ahead and read it that way.

It continues to interest me because it looks at a traditional idea/image in a new and poetic way.